President Aquino broke the Philippine
National Police (PNP) chain of command when he directly dealt with
Director Getulio Napeñas, then commander of the police Special Action
Force (SAF), in connection with “Oplan Exodus,” the operation to
neutralize suspected international terrorists Zhulkifli bin Hir alias
Marwan, Ahmad Akmad Batabol Usman, and Armin Baco alias Jihad, the PNP
Board of Inquiry (BOI) said in its report.
The BOI report stated that while the
President has the prerogative to deal directly with Napeñas instead of
PNP officer-in-charge Deputy Director General Leonardo Espina, such act
bypassed the established PNP chain of command.
But resigned PNP chief Director General
Alan Purisima, in his position paper submitted to the Senate, said the
chain of command principle is a military concept that does not strictly
apply to the PNP, a civilian organization.
Instead, what applies to the PNP are the
principles of supervision, direction, control, and delegation of powers
as understood in the context of civil service laws, rules, and
regulations as well as under administrative law, Purisima said in a
13-page position paper he submitted to the Senate Public Order Committee
chaired by Sen. Grace Poe.
The BOI report on the Mamasapano
tragedy, which was submitted last Thursday to Espina, also stated that
it was President Aquino who “gave the go-signal and allowed the
execution of Oplan Exodus after the Concept of Operations (Conops) was
presented to him by Napeñas.” The report also concluded that President
Aquino “allowed the participation of suspended PNP chief Purisima in the
planning and execution of Oplan Exodus despite the suspension order of
the Ombudsman.”
ROXAS CLEARS AQUINO
But Interior and Local Government
Secretary Mar Roxas was quick to clear President Aquino, saying the
Chief Executive had no liability.
“The President took steps to remedy the situation,” said Roxas, citing the same BOI report submitted to him.
“He correctly authorized that Marwan is a
target. There is no liability to that. In fact, pag hindi niya ginawa
yan may pananagutan ang Pangulo kasi yan ang kanyang tungkulin (if he
did not do it then he will be answerable for his inaction as that is his
job),” Roxas stressed.
Roxas instead blamed Purisima for the failed operation in Mamasapano, Maguindanao.
The DILG chief said that even though the
President talked to Purisima, he still recognized his suspension and
that is why he directed the suspended PNP chief to tell Espina about the
operation, which the police official chose not to do.
The BOI report only confirmed earlier suspicions that Purisima is to blame for the deaths of the 44 SAF commandos, Roxas said.
“Nakumpirma ang aking pagiisip na ang
may pangunahing pananagutan dito sa pagkamatay ng 44 SAF troopers ay
walang iba kundi ang suspendidong Director General Alan Purisima. (It
confirmed my thoughts that the primary person who is responsible for the
deaths of the 44 SAF troopers is none other than Purisima),” said
Roxas.
PURISIMA BLAMED
In a press conference at Camp Crame
yesterday, Roxas said the resigned PNP chief is responsible for the
failed operation from the very beginning.
And while he did delegate it to Napeñas,
who was relieved after the Mamasapano carnage, it was still Purisima’s
job to ensure its success and see through its supervision and quality
control.
But when he was suspended, Purisima lost
authority over the operation. What he failed to do next was also
critical in the operation’s success, which was to pass on the chain of
command to Espina, the PNP officer-in-charge.
“Not only did he fail to pass it on, but he even told Director Napeñas to keep it a secret from Espina and me,” lamented Roxas.
He added that Purisima failed to follow
the order of President Aquino for him to coordinate with the Armed
Forces of the Philippines (AFP) twice, the first time was even before
his suspension.
After President Aquino instructed
Purisima and Napeñas to coordinate with the Armed Forces of the
Philippines (AFP), Purisima told Napeñas, “Ako na ang bahala kay
Catapang [I will handle (AFP Chief of Staff Gen. Gregorio Pio)
Catapang].”
Under the PNP Manual Doctrine, BOI said,
that PNP members should have “word of honor,” meaning their word is
their bond. But the fact that Purisima failed to coordinate with the AFP
meant that he broke his word.
Likewise, the BOI said, Purisima
violated the preventive suspension order issued by the Ombudsman when he
participated in the planning and execution of Oplan Exodus. The
resigned PNP chief also provided inaccurate information to the President
on the actual situation on the ground, the BOI report stated.
Roxas said that the SAF troopers were
assured that they have a “resbak” in the form of AFP canon and artillery
and that is why they braved the “suicide mission” in the first place.
But Roxas said the “resbak” failed to
arrive because of lack of coordination and it was also kept a secret
from the AFP even though the President ordered coordination.
NAPEÑAS DEFIED PRESIDENT
On the part of Napeñas, the BOI said
that he defied the President’s directive to coordinate with the Armed
Forces of the Philippines (AFP) prior to the operation by insisting on
his Time-on-Target (TOT) coordination concept. The TOT, it said, does
not conform with the established and acceptable operational concepts and
protocols of the PNP.
Napeñas also violated the chain of
command when he followed the instructions of Purisima despite his
knowledge that he was preventively suspended by the Ombudsman. He was
also held responsible for his failure to “effectively supervise,
control, and direct personnel which resulted in heavy casualties.”
NO KID GLOVES
As this developed, Malacañang said
Purisima will not be treated with kid gloves after a police inquiry
report supposedly found him liable for the bungled police mission in
Mamasapano, Maguindanao.
Deputy Presidential Spokeswoman Abigail
Valte made clear that any case against erring individuals would be based
on evidence, as she tried to allay speculations Purisima may get off
the hook due to his friendship with President Aquino.
“The President has always been clear
that we will follow wherever the evidence goes. And so far, we don’t see
sparing anyone just because some people say so,” Valte told reporters
in the Palace.
“Again, it really should be based on evidence, which is why, in the first place, the BOI was called or convened,” she added.
DFA CLEARS US
Meanwhile, the Department of Foreign
Affairs (DFA) said that although the BOI report specifically mentioned
the involvement of American forces in the botched operation, it
maintains that there was no violation of cooperation agreement between
the Philippines and the United States.
“The BOI report says US involvement (in
the Mamasapano operation) is limited to intelligence sharing and
evaluation, not in actual combat operation,” DFA Spokesman Charles Jose
said in a statement issued on Friday.
Part of this intelligence sharing is providing real time information, Jose pointed out.
“This is also consistent with the
earlier DFA statement that planning and execution of the Mamasapano
operation were 100 percent Filipino,” he further said. (With reports
from Mario B. Casayuran, Genalyn D. Kabiling, and Roy C. Mabasa)
No comments:
Post a Comment